Monday, May 31, 2021

Quakers Working in the Legislature

RantWoman is queueing up a good #MemorialDay fit in her other blog. Here RantWoman wants to pay tribute to people who protect our democracy by laboring in the legislative process, by working to try to prevent the need to send more people into combat, and by striving to overcome past wrongs and to amek our society better.

RantWoman has decided to post items like this with minimal further commentary and to post the Journey to Planet RantWoman angles in their own posts. So stay tuned.

And in the meantime, beside the video, enjoy FCNL's  awesome Directory of Congressional Staffers 


Saturday, May 29, 2021

The Secret World of Temper Tantrums

Posted without comment beyond generally holding toddlers and one particular toddler across the hall in the Light.

Friday, May 28, 2021

Scholars excavate scene of Tulsa Race Massacre to "reconstruct a suppres...

Not quite in time for the anniversary of this event, but one of those moments never to forget.

Thursday, May 27, 2021

Rep. Lauren "My pronoun is 'Patriot' " Boebert

Warning: the unexpected path to environmental insight opinions here are half-baked. More research is in order, and RantWoman may or may not be able to dial the sarcasm level back to less plainspoken or better quakerese levels.


RantWoman's two most consistent messages in Meeting for Worship are about the importance of praying across differences and about help coming from surprising directions. 


Consider RantWoman's leading from time to time to visit Rep. Lauren Boebert's (R CO-3) Twitter Feed. 


RantWoman permits herself to visit Ms. Boebert's worldview both out of morbid fascination and because "them's mah peeps." Rep. Boebert represents the part of CO where the RantFamily long ago lived and where there are still many kinfolk from RantMom's side of the family.. 


Aside from the tweet about pronoun referenced above, two other Tweets have tumbled provocatively out of the stew of Trumpian and :they're coming for our guns" tropes.


Tonight's Tweet in reference to this Reuters item Biden Looks overseas for minerals needed for electric car batteries Ms. Boebert quote Tweeted the article link with a common accusing President Biden of not caring about children in the Congo having to mine minerals with their bare hands when he could be creating good jobs in the US. 


RantWoman always appreciates it when politicians go for easy low-hanging fruit--like defending the human rights of people ensnared in child labor. Actually reading the article and the Reuters framing of Biden administration priorities kind of made RantWoman go "ewwwww" and not only because there was no mention of child labor. The part about do all the polluting in Africa and all the value added work in the US does not enchant RantWoman. But then RantWoman is already an electric car skeptic. Electric cars are heavier than other cars and therefore more likely to tear up roads and more dangerous for any pedestrian they hit. Can't we just have fewer cars, more transit, better bike and ped infra? 


Yes, yes buses also tear up the roads and we do not get instantly to rebuild every city in the US to be a 15-minute city, the kind of place where one can get everything one needs within a 15-minute walk. But we still need better bike and ped infra. And RantWoman fears all this would be lost on Rep. Boebert anyway.


But RantWoman digresses from the life and extraordinary career of Rep. Boebert. Maybe if Ms. Boebert could find someone to regularly brief her about that science stuff, she might be able to work on environmentally friendly ways to use resource deposits in her own district. Maybe?


The other recent tweet that sticks in RantWoman's mind is about President Biden waiving sanctions against Russia and signing off on something to do with credits to help build Nordstream 2, a pipeline from Russia to Western Europe. The pipeline is routed to bypass the ability of Ukraine to collect transit fees for oil passing over its territory. Waiving sections and allowing pipeline construction to proceed is meant to reassure NATO countries that, unlike the previous occupant of the White House, the Biden administration cares about the US relationship with western Europe.  Rep. Boebert is sore about approving things to do with Nordstream 2 instead of support all the jobs supposedly connected with the Keystone Xl pipeline. 


Rep. Boebert's comment makes RantWoman scratch her head. Actually, if people in North America are supposed to leave the hydrocarbons in the ground, shouldn't that also apply to Russia?   


RantWoman recognizes that  this suggestion is from WAY out in left field. RantWoman remembers one academic conference in 1990 or 1991 when the Soviet Union was busy falling apart and the geopolitics of pipeline routings were topic number 1 on several panels. In the murky world of post-Soviet nations, the US is trying simultaneously to nurture democracy or at least foster accountable civil society, to fight corruption, and to express displeasure about hacking US elections and military incursions on the border with Ukraine or Belarusian dictator forcing a commercial flight to land in order to kidnap a journalist. 


With apologies for blurring issues related to several countries, RantWoman is just not sure waiving sanctions against Russia to build a pipeline that will allow more greenhouse gases to be spewed into the air is a great idea. RantWoman guesses she is supposed to thank Rep. Boebert for making her think about all this. RantWoman also finds herself sincerely hoping Rep. Boebert has someone competent on her staff knowledgeable enough to help sort out all the different angles.


And that is even before the US gets to figure out who from Russia hacked the software running the colonial pipeline!

PS. What do you know! There is a Petition calling for a Moratorium on NS2 signed by many people from different Eastern European countries, two former US ambassadors to Russia and a scholar RantWoman was in grad school with.So now, RantWoman not only wonders what Rep. Boebert is thinking; RantWoman also wonders what President Biden is thinking.


 And one more Topical item from the Financial Times

Friday, May 21, 2021

Legal Strategy by "the most unwoke woke person in the world


Content Warning: EXTREMELY offensive ableist language. Try to make it through the video anyway.

This post brought to you by all criminal justice reformers, prison abolitionists and anyone pondering what should happen to people who stormed the Capitol on January 6.

Starting at about 2:40, legal strategy by "the most unwoke woke person in the world."



At the intersection of Buddhist and Quaker: New book by Genjo Marinello

A wonderful-sounding book by a Buddhist / Quaker author



Reflections on Awakening and Maturity for Spiritual Companions by Genjo Marinello


Roshi Genjo's Book on the SDI site as in how to get the book.

SDI Home Page

RantWoman on first listen noted the phrase "I'm not sure I'm a Quaker." RantWoman invites readers to listen for and reflect on the comment.


Finally because RantWoman's quest to find her better soul is always littered wtih gripes, grumbles and accessibility-related conniptions:

--The book is only available in print on Amazon

--HOWEVER, the work is also findable on the SDI site as a podcast

Yes of course RantWoman is bright and resourceful and conversant with search engines. However there are multiple reasons RantWoman would be THRILLED if the initial promo that came her way mentioned both print and alternate formats.

(The last comment contains pointed eldering. Enough said or can anyone imagine why RantWoman might be spectacularly clear and greatly in need of a filter to find the right Quakerese?)

Thursday, May 20, 2021

Global Accessibility Awareness Day notes from Quakerdom

 Happy #GAAD #GAAD2021


Accessibility is a big and complex topic. Plus for RantWoman in true early Quaker no respecter of days fashion, Global Accessibility Awareness Day is every day. RantWoman definitely recommends EVERYONE be open to continuing revelation. In the meantime, in celebration... some ups and downs


Giant kudos to the organizers of the most recent FWCC Section of the Americas virtual gathering. Accessibility is never perfect. For RantWoman though simply using Google products and using them well was a godsend. So RantWoman imagines are virtual meetings in general for many people.


RantWoman's mind can muddle in many directions about libraries, The Bible in large print and / or in apps, archives, what to archive... There are more accessibility stories here than RantWoman wants to write.


On the other hand, with some degree of apology for being utterly charm-challenged in the delivery:


Suppose a person is dyslexic and does not read print. Suppose the person who is dyslexic writes a book. What is getting in the way of immediately making available not only the printed version, but also an audio version.


Suppose Friends A and B retire from different branches of the government but somehow manage to retire withouth ever colliding with questions of accessible content and reasonable accommodations. Are they open to continuing revelation?

Faith Action Network Spring Summits and Faith Community support for COVID resilience

 

 

Dear Advocates,

Our Spring Summits begin this weekend! We want to hear from you, so please don't miss the opportunity to attend one of them. Each spring, FAN gathers advocates from across the state to reflect on the past legislative session, discuss the issues you want to work on together in the future, and get to know our neighbors. This year we will again be meeting virtually, and each of our two summits will be statewide with breakout groups by location and by issue interest group. We hope you can join us this Sunday, May 23 from 2-4 PM, or Sunday, June 6 from 2-4 PM - register using the buttons below. We will share the same content at each summit, so you only need to choose one!

After you register, we will send you the Zoom link. Make sure your Zoom is updated to the latest version so you can fully participate. Here is the direct link to download the latest update, or you can read more here.


Faiths in Action for Vaccines

This week, FAN was able to meet with Dr. Umair Shah, Secretary of the WA State Dept. of Health, to discuss the critical role faith communities statewide continue to play during COVID-19, in conjunction with our host, Rev. Douglas Avilesbernal and the Evergreen Association of American Baptist Churches. You’ll be hearing more about this at our Summits. In the meantime, we wanted to highlight the wonderful efforts of New Beginnings Christian Fellowship in Kent to provide a vaccine clinic weekly for the community, in this Seattle Times article

Nationally: Faiths4Vaccines is hosting a National Summit on Wednesday, May 26 from 1-4PM Eastern (10AM - 1 PM Pacific). Faith leaders, faith communities, and medical professionals are leading efforts to respond, recover from the unprecedented health crises facing our nation and the world. Now, equipped with a life-saving vaccine, we have the chance to bring this devastating virus, and all the suffering it has caused, to an end.
 
Join us at the National Summit for the largest multi-faith gathering to support equitable and far-reaching vaccine distribution in the United States. Faith leaders and faith-based organizations in attendance will receive training, resources and empowerment to engage their communities to ensure equitable vaccine access and potentially use their houses of worship as vaccination sites. Click here to register for the event.


In Washington State: The American Lung Association and Washington Thoracic Society have teamed up to offer the “COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in BIPOC Communities” speaker series. Partners will provide culturally relevant, science-based, factual information about the COVID-19 vaccination. These conversations also will explore vaccine hesitancy and the role of systemic racism. Please see this informational flyer for more information.

  • May 18th | 12-1pm: Vaccine Hesitancy- Laboratory Safety, Production and Distribution and the Role of Systemic Racism
    • Speakers: Dr. Stephaun Wallace, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center COVID-19 Prevention Network, and Courtney Christian, PhRMA.
  • May 25th | 12-1pm: Vaccine Hesitancy in the Black/African American Community
    • Speakers: Dr. Ben Danielson, University of Washington
  • June 3rd | 12-1pm: Vaccine Hesitancy in the Native American, Pacific Islander and Alaska Native American Communities
    • Speakers: Dr. Dakota Lane, Lummi Nation, and Dr. Bonnie Duran, University of Washington Schools of Social Work and Public Health
  • June 8th | 12-1pm: Vaccine Hesitancy in the Hispanic Community

RSVP HERE. Please feel to share with community partners and networks. This event is open to the public and free of charge. 

 

FacebookTwitter

 

Wednesday, May 19, 2021

Fourth Saturday Worship for May

RantWoman has been finding great steadiness lately worshiping with the FCNL Witness Wednesday silent reflection. (Curious readers: use your search engines. Witness Wednesdays come with breakout rooms and RantWoman was thrilled in one breakout to learn that FCNL has a digital strategist!) 

 Now, on to Fourth Saturday Worship, Zoom coordinates below.

 Fourth Saturday worship is intended to begin with silent worship with an invitation to consider this poem offered at Witness Wednesday by Diana Ohlbaum 


Seek patience by Maya Angelou


Seek patience

and passion

in equal amounts.


Patience alone

will not build the temple.


Passion alone

will destroy its walls.


Join Zoom Meeting Fourth Saturday Worship

In Light and Faithfulness


RantWoman

RantMom and Nasturtiums in Salad Friend do PR- Ida Culver House Ravenna webinar

RantWoman posts this video here with minimal commentary. 

One figure here is RantMom

Another is known on this blog as Nasturtiums in Salad Friend. 

One of RantWoman's favorite stories about Nasturtiums in Salad Friend:

 

Sunday, May 9, 2021

An offer and a STRONG suggestion

First RantWoman wants to express deep appreciation to more than one individual who continues to share UFM materials with RantWoman. RantWoman is happy to offer to anyone willing to listen commentary about why RantWoman is NOT called to walk away from UFM and how the materials help RantWoman continue to be faithful to her Light.


Second, RantWoman strongly urges Friends NOT to lay down the work of the Ad-Hoc Committee on Disabilities. In fact, RantWoman is called to offer to clerk ongoing work of the Ad-hoc Committee on Disabilities. RantWoman does not have time here to list all the factors leading RantWoman to clarity about this offer. RantWoman asks that Friends accept it and go forward in hope that MUCH appreciate progress about work on disabilities issues will continue and grow in the whole community. RantWoman is happy to provide a considerable list of disability related topics important to RantWoman that keep getting erased from community conversation and to propose a revised charter for next steps. 


ONE factor behind RantWoman's leading: RantWoman is grateful for many people's offers to serve the community. However, RantWoman notes a continuing problem of people ignoring RantWoman's suggestions, trying to wear too many hats rather than strategize about how to share work, and then feeling overworked and exhausted. RantWoman is holding that problem in the Light.


RantWoman invites everyone in the community, NOT just members of pastoral care communities to participate in a short-term (3-6 month) project related to greater understanding of the Quaker concep of eldering. 


Now as to RantWoman's moment of appreciation above, RantWoman notes a concern in recent minutes about how sharing information with RantWoman is "harming" others. RantWoman notes a continuing pattern of talking ABOUT RantWoman rather than talking WITH RantWoman. 


RantWoman contrasts this with email from some time ago where RantWoman was advised "Please take good and gentle care of yourself because this is going to be painful." 


Painful for whom and why? RantWoman for instance lately has frequently been embarrassed on UFM's behalf. RantWoman reminds readers of her childhood experiences listening painfully to the efforts of many promising but definitely only progressing double reed students. 


RantWoman has more than once tried to listen to the hurts of others only to come away with a sense that she is just supposed to apologize for existing, having needs, and not performing blind person according to others' expectations. RantWoman cannot apologize for many realities in her life. RantWoman absolutely can apologize for communicating badly many times and can only promise to try to learn and do better.


Furthermore, accessibility needs to occur whether people have hurt feelings or not.


One Friend complains that that Friend thinks RantWoman feels entitled to hurt others. RantWoman has no idea without trying to hold specific hurts whether there is anything she can do to ease hurts. RantWoman also here invokes her "white cane rule." RantWoman can see enough to get around without her cane in many situations. RantWoman also uses her cane very differently than other people with less vision. If RantWoman plows into someone while NOT using her cane, RantWoman is absolutely responsible; if RantWoman plows into someone while using her cane, maybe RantWoman still needs to pay better attention, but please don't say RantWoman did not warn you.


Does RantWoman get hurt feelings like anyone else? Unquestionably. Should RantWoman handle them better much of the time? Probably.


All that said, one of the most important paths to accessibility is continuing revelation. This week RantWoman participated in the 10th or 11th Microsoft Ability Summit. These events have been key realization of the work of Chief Accessibility Officer Jenny Lay Flurry, a very personable Deaf woman very adept at weaving people's individual stories into company success This year's event was all virtual and featured many employees with disabilities talking about disability-related topics, programs and products at Microsoft, about not "covering" or hiding their disabilities. The event was very inclusively done and positive. If a corporate giant like Microsoft can do Disability Pride, surely Friends can also keep learning!

Let's talk about STIMMING


A moment of lived experience with Autism and COVID vaccination.


Links for two articles referenced in the reprinted newsletter article below.

Stimming 101 or How I learned to stop worrying and love the stim

The Dark of Stimming Self-injury and destructive habits


RantWoman experience points, including stuff RantWoman always gets to think about before she fully interacts with the content. RantWoman offers these essential realities of her life offered unapologetically. If these details make other Friends' as well as members of the famous Care and Accountability Committee eyes glaze over, RantWoman invites readers to skip to the next heading.

--The Home page The Artism Spectrum looks like it has a lot of useful information.

--The site behaves well with RantWoman's screen reader EXCEPT for the ads which just sound realy stupid when read through RantWoman's screen reader.

--Has RantWoman mentioned that, as with apps, every time RantWoman touches a website she gets to fret about possible gaps in accessibility?


The Newsletter article (reproduced with some typographical lacunae RantWoman may or may not manage to redact.)

Let’s talk about stimming!

Mackenzie Barton-Rowledge

“Stimming” is short for “self-stimulating.” Everyone stims to  some extent, whether that’s bouncing your leg when sitting, twirling your hair, biting your nails or clicking a pen’s button  more times than necessary.

Neurotypicals—that is, people with “typical” brains—are the definition for “normal” stimming, but the beauty of neurodiversity means that there are many people who stim  much more than the average neurotypical. Autism is the neurological set-up most commonly associated with stimming, but it’s not the only one. People all over the neurodiversity spectrum may use stimming to self-regulate, to focus or to express themselves (like, squealing with joy).

In response to the UFM disability survey, someone asked if we could learn about stimming. So I want to share this pair of articles that I really enjoyed:

Stimming 101, or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Stim

The Dark Side of the Stim: Self-injury and Destructive Habits

Both are written by Kirsten Lindsmith, an autistic artist, writer, software  developer and autism advocate.of anxiety, of anything), is  something that everyone has felt at some time or another is something that everyone has felt at some time or another.

Autistics are easily overloaded, and simply need to release tension more frequently. When I stim, I often feel like an old fashioned boiler letting off pressure—sometimes in tiny bursts, sometimes in huge belches of steam. Sometimes stimming releases pressure—especially the  good kind of stimming. Sometimes a stim will help us focus to block out invasive and overwhelming sensory input, becoming an essential coping aide.

It’s a type of self-soothing, whether one needs to be soothed because something is just too cute or because that ambulance siren is just way too loud, the root cause is essentially the same.

In my opinion, the question shouldn’t be why autistic  people stim, it should be why do autistic people stim in such a specific way. Not every autistic stims, and not every autistic person shares all the typically autistic stims. I’m a finger waver, but I’m not often a hand flapper. I have a vast number of vocal stims, but I’m not usually a rocker or a bobber. I know hair-twirlers who rock back and forth.  I know knuckle-crackers and foot-tappers who don’t wave fingers or flap hands. Every autistic is as unique as her  own personal stimming lexicon.” (Emphasis and links in original)

In our society, disabled folks are often intentionally and explicitly separated from neurotypicals—special education is a prime example. One result of this segregation is that those of us who are (or who could pass as) neurotypical often have not  been exposed to the full spectrum of neurodiversity, including the many ways people self-regulate by stimming. Teasing and reprimands push people to repress “excessive” stims as much as we can, decreasing the natural diversity of ways of being that seem “normal” to society. So anything beyond neurotypical stimming may make people uncomfortable.

Usually ignorance and ableist prejudice is the problem, not the stim itself. While there are a handful of unhealthy stims, which Kirsten talks about in the second article, most stims are entirely  harmless. But stims can be alarming if you’re not used to them! If someone starts flapping their arms or moaning repetitively, you might wonder if they’re in crisis, on drugs or detached from reality. You might feel afraid, because if one  Kirsten describes stims as “essential self-calming behaviors.”

She says that one of the most common questions she gets is “why do autistic people stim?” Her answer: The build up of emotion, the need to release emotional or physical tension due to an overload (of cuteness, of type of “normal” behavior has been thrown out the window, who can predict what that person will do next? But stimming is a normal and healthy tool for many people. On the contrary, suppressing stims may lead to meltdowns or outbursts.

Being interpreted as threatening just for having a sensitive nervous system can have deadly consequences. Elijah McClain was Black, autistic and 23 years old when he was murdered by police after someone called 911 because he was “waving his arms,” a common stim. Leroy Moore, a disabled Black educator and advocate, estimates that approximately 70% of those killed by police are disabled.

It is long past time for neurotypicals to broaden our understanding and acceptance of neurodiversity. These two articles offer a starting point for understanding stimming—and some tricks to manage self-harm! I hope you will enjoy learning from them as much as I did.


RantWoman commentary:

--RantWoman thinks reading the voices of people with disabilities in their own words is really important and RantWoman does not want to discourage contributions to the newsletter. Here though, maybe RantWoman would have offered only limited quotes, would have let the links speak for themselves and maybe would have written a whole article about police shootings and people with disabilities. .

--RantWoman almost did not reprint the full article partly because RantWoman found the copyediting a little confusing. RantWoman will now stick to better copyediting of her own stuff.

--RantWoman does not know what to make of the word "enjoy." These articles are important and contain valuable details, details that definitely do not sound like fun to live with, but "enjoy" is not necessarily the first word RantWoman would use even to describe the read


Stimming and Quakerdom

1. RantWoman finds herself imagining earnest Quakers trying to speak of, say, stimming in Meeting for worship. The quakerese word for speaking of a concern about problematic behavior is "eldering." Some efforts at eldering go better than others. RantWoman can imagine a conversation going something like

Friend attempting to elder "WE don't stim / crochet / do sudoku in Meeting for worship."

Friend being eldered. "I have been listening to the NPR show 'Says You,' and you get 5 points for knowing what stimming is, but who is 'WE?' I know many people who find these and other activities very helpful in getting to a worshipful center."

(Readers curious about the subject of sudoku are invited to use the search bar on this blog. RantWoman's version of the above response might or might not include encyclopedic discussion of vision loss realities and perhaps further eldering such as "Friend, be glad you can see across the room to be bothered. And if RantWoman doing sudoku in Meeting for worship is the worst problem of your day, say a prayer of gratitude about that too!")


2.RantWoman finds the second article really helpful both in terms of an individual autistic person's issues and in terms of spiritual accompaniment for any parent, spouse or caregiver. RantWoman finds it helpful when a member of a specific community can say "this is too much" with love and tenderness.


3. RantWoman highly recommends Musings of a Quaker Witch for one thing because there are 4 really frank articles about disability highlighted in a box on the right hand side of the page.


RantWoman is curious, where will Friends be led next?

Heroes of our Time via the 2015 Eurovision Song Contest with Biblical overtones

RantWoman lately has been grabbing about an earworm of the week, some musical experience usually from YouTube that RantWoman is likely to listen to over and over for awhile until she grows tired of it and needs to shift her musical diet.

Ask RantWoman, just ask, to reflect on continuing revelation as it relates to music.

Ask, just ask, about music as part of a community's heartbeat.

RantWoman is fond of this number.

RantWoman advises readers, song lyrics are song lyrics. RantWoman herself does not know to what some initial parts of the song refer. Do not dwell there. Let the song carry you forward.

RantWoman will be happy to elaborate about how to get from the Gospel of John to part of the messages RantWoman finds here. 

RantWoman would have no problem tapping into a large fountain of other messages swirling in RantWoman's head, escept that RantWoman is striving to listen to her body and her body says SLEEP. The Messages will keep. And enjoy the song anytime.



Friday, May 7, 2021

Sarah Palin Wins "Worst Mother in America" Award

RantWoman freely acknowledges that giving the entire topic of Sarah Palin and her family any air time at all is a fast way to tip conversation over into the realm of VERY BAD FRIEND.

And RantWoman willingly goes there. The fam certainly needs to be held in the Light even if RantWoman is entertained by the thought of a politician who both knows how to field dress a moose and, reportedly, says she can see Russia from her house

Happy Mothers day all. RantWoman also promises some hearts and flowers.

Tuesday, May 4, 2021

Specific Asks

 RantWoman is growing tired of vague instructions and nebulous timelines for progress about matters important to her. RantWoman is seasoning questions of how much inflammatory commentary needs to make it into her blog and probably will update content. 


In the meantime, RantWoman invites Friends to consider the following invitations and specific adjustments to previous policies.


--I am called to attend at least one virtual and one in-person Meeting for worship per month. I have appreciated the opportunity to worship with other Meetings. I am clear that I am NOT called to walk away from UFM. However I am unclear that I want to return to fulltime participation only in UFM so perhaps that needs to be left for further discernment.


--I am called to participate in Meeting for Business every other month.  Depending on other involvement in community life, I would consider coming only once a quarter.


--Please immediately return me to the UFM announcements and weekly bulletin email lists


--Please allow me to publicize Fourth Saturday worship through UFM channels.


--Please avail yourselves of opportunities and invitations I have offered to attend interest groups and other activities to educate the community about accessibility issues.


I am happy to consider Friends' suggestions about how to make progress on these requests


I am happy to continue to offer technical assistance about areas where I have specific needs and where others are clearly not displaying expertise such as software accessibility. I am happy to work with individual committees and wherever possible to be flexible about inclusive practices and approaches to accessibility.


Minute on a Common? Understanding of Community Guidelines

RantWoman has been asked whether she is willing to agree to the Minute of Common Understanding of Community Guidelines. RantWoman has dumped the text of this Minute on a common understanding... here because the document cannot be found at the current version of the UFM website If this is the best anyone can do and it is supposed to apply to everyone, not just to RantWoman, RantWoman would tartly suggest posting it publicly. On the other hand, PERHAPS Friends would be willing to try working WITH RantWoman; perhaps a revision might emerge that more fully speaks to what RantWoman understands of  quakerism even in this fragile beset community.


RantWoman expects here only to make a few key points and then to leave point by point work for another forum. 


RantWoman notes reference at the beginning to Quaker processes serving for hundreds of years. RantWoman notes absence of any reference to the Quaker concept of continuing revelation, a concept highly relevant in evolving practices that nurture individual gifts which arrive wrapped in widerly varying abilities and disabilities as we weave together gifts to strengthen community.


 RantWoman enthusiastically believes in shared guidelines to support and nurture community. RantWoman would not mind in the least if this document had included specific references to Faith and Practice or processes for addressing the mishmash of concepts bounced over.


RantWoman finds much in this document that she has no problem with even though the aspirational aspects could perhaps be more fully expressed.


RantWoman also finds points that are mutually contradictory, sloppily drafted and involve concepts which may or may not be understood by others. 


RantWoman notes references to clearness committees, a point discussed in a separate post.


To be blunt, RantWoman is seasoning some experiences that mean she cannot blithely and automatically sign onto these guidelines if they involve swallowing continuing patterns of abuse and silencing, tolerating thoughtless behavior that endangers her and/or others' physical safety, and stalls in lack of TIMELY progress on pathway for continuing revelation about topics such as the technological issues essential for RantWoman's ability to function.


RantWoman also needs to note vigorous objections to the process of creating this document. This document was slapped together in a Meeting for Business from which RantWoman was excluded after a previous Meeting for Business where RantWoman was called in rather challenging form to speak to matters of disability. RantWoman stands by her call to speak. RantWoman stands by the appropriateness of articulating her concern in Meeting for Business. RantWoman is sorry for making the clerk so angry that she stomped out of the room, a point RantWoman did not even realize until someone told her later. Only recently has someone been able to articulate that it was the end of Meeting for Business, people including RantWoman were tired and hungry and RantWoman's comment was not going to change anything in the short term anyway. 

One post relating to the Meeting for Business in question Tenants Transparency Trust post

Another post that encapsulates also another transparency point where RantWoman would be THRILLED if other voices spoke of her concerns so that RantWoman did not have to do all the talking.

Stewardship Due Diligence

That post contains a link about the original business meeting.


RantWoman's bigger process concern: this minute was slapped together in a month and looks to RantWoman like retaliation for speaking out about disability. On the other hand, the clearness committee on disability had a minute ready for MONTHS to bring to Meeting for Business about creating an Ad-hoc committee on Disability. The committee was only created after UFM says it released RantWoman from membership.  under these circumstances NO ONE can release RantWoman either from moral obligation to speak or from call to continue to try to draw out better tendencies among a community that has LONG nurtured RantWoman.


But RantWoman, the Guidelines? Yes or No? 


More Yes than No and yet some really hard NO's. and HOPEFULLY room to continue to work on...


But RantWoman, we don't have time....


RantWoman has said more than enough for today. Either RantWoman will say more herself another day or she will give in to hordes of barfing bedbugs demanding to deviate from their usual Leap day cycles in light of the pandemic and threatening to take over her fingers...


RantWoman, STOP. Can we all breathe?



The Actual Minute on a common understanding of Community Guidelines


GUIDELINES
University Friends Meeting - April 14 2019
At a time when University Friends Meeting is facing challenges to our community life we reaffirm our
commitment to the following beliefs and behaviors. The bullet points below are suggested ways to
implement the guidelines, not hard and fast rules.
Quaker processes and practices have served us well for hundreds of years.
● In business meeting speak only when called on by the clerk and stop speaking when asked to do
so by the clerk.
● Trust that committees are doing their work with their best Light.
● If tempted to speak repeatedly or at length on multiple items in business meeting, remember
that doing so may silence those who are quieter or take longer to be ready to speak.
● Trust the process of corporate discernment. Accept eldering when it comes in a spirit of love
from one of the pastoral care committees. A clearness committee can be a resource for this.
Every member and attender has that of God within them and should be treated with respect.
● Treat Friends with respect. Do not insult or call names, directly or indirectly.
● Be Kind. Do not make hurtful comments in person or by email about another person in the
Meeting.
● Be careful in your language. Do not speak or write disrespectfully of another Meeting member
or attender in spoken, written or electronic communication.
● Assume that others are speaking from their Divine center. Listen openly and do not attribute
intentions, motivations or feelings.
The meeting community as a whole, and individual Friends within the community have a right to
boundaries.
● Boundaries should be respected without blame, accusation, harassment, or questioning.
● If someone asks not to receive certain types of communication, be respectful of that. Check who
is receiving emails and be mindful of people’s preferences when using “Reply All”.
Structural inequalities such as able-ism, classism, or racism are real.
● Recognize that the Society of Friends and the world at large have significant structural
inequalities and that Meeting members have differing experiences of the impacts of these.
● Be mindful of the ways in which the UFM community is participating in structural inequality.
● Strive to recognize the difference between uncomfortable and unsafe when hearing someone
address structural inequalities.
● Speak your truth with love.
Queries
1. Do I speak and act on the assumption that differences in perspective in Meeting are waystations
on a path to unity?
2. When there is a conflict, do I refuse to blame any individual or group? Do I accept conflict as one
way we are led to a fuller understanding of the Light?
3. Are my messages spoken from my own experience with sincerity and integrity?
4. Do I state my position simply as one person among equals? Am I open to convincement by
others in Meeting?
5. Do I monitor myself in the Light when taking offense? Do I refuse to label other friends?
6. Do I acknowledge that none of us is flawless in either public or private life?

Are you willing to accept eldering?

 

RantWoman has been asked "are you willing to accept eldering?"


RantWoman's initial response was "eldering has to be possible both to and from RantWoman. 


After modest consideration, RantWoman needs to back up a couple steps and to expand her thoughts..


First, there needs to be a shared understanding of what eldering is, preferably based both on experience and on materials available to RantWoman in formats accessible both to RantWoman and to others. RantWoman would be very happy to work with whoever is interested, whether on a committee or not to compile suitable materials.


RantWoman will review items tagged Eldering on this blog to see whether she has catalogued some topical materials. 


Recently while discerning about an invitation from NPYM Nominating Committee, RantWoman came across materials from the NPYM M&O Consultation on Eldering  including the . The report out from the consultation Honestly, RantWoman's first reaction: COME ON, this is pretty thin gruel! 


RantWoman says this out of love and concern for the life of the community, not only people who have been Quakers forever and people new to life among Friends. Has RantWoman mentioned fierce leading to nurture care about this topic among people younger than 60? 


RantWoman also says this with some awareness of the deep wells of resources available in the wider Society of Friends.


Next, RantWoman has rather frank and unflattering assessments of some past efforts to elder her. RantWoman had WAY to much fun awhile ago writing a "How NOT to do it" video script related to lobbying. RantWoman would also find it way to much fun to provide comparable scripts based on her experience. RantWoman may or may not wait to be asked. Hold that concern in the Light.


Third, RantWoman has a queue of eldering thoughts she is seasoning paths to deliver. Some are related to the how NOT to do it experiences above. Here are a couple examples. 


Friend if you never ever talk to RantWoman except for messages that sound to RantWoman like "shut up," how do you think that is working? And if it's Meeting for Business and  you accompany that with a shush and unsolicited "hug" that makes RantWoman feel smothered, how do you imagine that is going to be received?


Friend, I feel awkward when I can never ever get hold of you at reasonable hours by phone, how am I supposed to convey concerns? I am not entirely comfortable in conversations when someone laughs about your behavior and I wonder how to get through to you? Also, I have talked to your kids a couple times about blindness in various Children's program events but I have never managed to have an adult conversation about topics such as accessibility and vocational rehabilitation. What are you willing to do to address that concern?


Friend, I notice you wear hats in several different Quaker bodies. Do you feel overloaded? What might you do to grow other Friends' capacity to support some of these activities?


Friend (x at least 2), I notice I seem particularly gifted about making your head explode. I asked the Care and Accountability committee over and over to set up clearness committees to address some of this sensitivity and that was beyond the ken of that committee. Now the community Guidelines mentioned elsewhere offer clearness committees, the same clearness committees RantWoman has previously asked about. What has changed now about Friends' capacity and willingness to provide clearness committees? Would we all be willing to draw on resources from other Meetings in our quarter? What else would help make clearness committee experiences successful? RantWoman has one makes her head explode process terminology issue that Friends can expect to hear more about going forward.


Friend (x at least two retired from different levels of govenment) are you willing to participate in conversations about terms such as reasonble accommodations in your work experience and how these concepts apply at UFM? Are you willing to discuss experience with and modelling of bureaucratic inertia?

Monday, May 3, 2021

Young Quaker Voices presentation at Pacific Northwest Quarterly Meeting 2021 04 23

RantWoman is thrilled that the Young Quaker Voices program exists! 

Young Quaker voices is a project of the WA state Quaker lobby group Quaker Voice. It provides one-on-one mentoring for people 30 or younger. The participants choose a bill or a campaign to study in depth and to follow during the legislative session.

This video is this year's cohort of participants reporting on their work connected with the 2021 legislative session.

RantWoman is really glad to hear of connections with other groups (including the WA Council of the Blind and the #MobilizeWA campaign aimed at funding better bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure throughout WA.



accessibility note: Youtube autocaptioning rocks.

Ashley at Woodbrooke: Evil Queens and wicked stepmothers

 One of RantWoman's favorite things to do these days is to lift up younger Quakers who are doing COOL stuff. A good thorough reading of women in the Bible has been badly needed for a long time. RantWoman has had neither the leading nor the focus to do it. Therefore RantWoman enthusiastically celebrates Ashley Wilco'x work and enthusiastically recommends that Friends check out a series Ashley is doing through Woodbrooke.


Evil Queens and Wicked Stepmothers


RantWoman apologizes for the uninspiring visual presentation. Just click on the link and things will be more visually interesting immediately.