Proposed Minute to Establish a Communications Committee:
text below the intro and followed by questions:
RanWoman Intro
RantWoman is called to continue to be faithful to her Light.
RantWoman assumes that a number of people still need help finding their better
selves, communicating what is positive, cutting down on negative and frankly
embarrassing messaging, and tending to why RantWoman continues to care
RantWoman suggests that people whose feelings are hurt about
this consider the negative messages being sent by what RantWoman hears is RantWoman
causing problems merely by existing. Maybe start by taking a good read at the
recent Disability Pride piece in Gleamings. Despite RantWoman’s quibbles it’s
not a terrible place to start.
RantWoman reminds everyone with hurt feelings that clearness committees are an option either through UFM or through Quarterly Meeting. RantWoman’s only requirement: rantWoman is severely allergic to sloppy use of the term “couples counseling.” On good days RantWoman gets that she is reacting badly to professionals just using the jargon of their field. Still, it’s the pandemic, good days should not be either taken for granted or wasted.
RantWoman’s understanding of the testimony on equality is
that people in some kind of a couple relationship are by far not the only people
who are ever parties to a conflict. RantWoman keeps praying that maybe she can
let her allergy go and find some pastoral care equivalent of Xyrtec to help her
cope. About that time RantWoman gets a severe quaking Speak Truth to Power spasm
telling her she really is not going to be able to drug away the depth of her
professional, contextual, and personal allergies.
RantWoman is also pretty sure there are resources AND
resources available in ways that meet a variety of accessibility needs for describing
needed conflict resolution processes without making RantWoman want to scream
and go delve into professional codes of ethics. Let us hold that problem in the
Light. For one thing, no matter how much about “disability pride” gets printed
in Gleamings, merely ACKNOWLEDGING this need in concrete actionable terms still
gets scrubbed out of commitments about work on disability issues.
RantWoman sees in this proposal great opportunity and AGAIN, as she has done MULTIPLE TIMES dating back to the original Communications task force offers her service, HOPEFULLY in more congenial MAYBE interpersonally nuanced form than this blog.
Text to be presented in Meeting for Business
University Friends Meeting approves establishing a
Communications Committee and directs Nominating Committee to bring nominations
for this new committee to either the summer 2021 or September 2021 Business
Meeting.
Background
In 2007-2008, UFM participated in a year of
Discernment. At the end of that 18-month year, the Meeting approved
establishing a Communications Task Force to develop and support the
communication need of the Meeting and individuals in the Meeting. The Task Force was not able to complete its job,
and we have worked without reliable oversight of our communications even as the
world of communications has evolved rapidly.
Recently an ad hoc IT committee has been reworking our use
of electronic communications, Zoom, the website, and information storage and
sharing, but there is no group charged with establishing policy or
methods. Gleamings is a stand-along
(sic) enterprise. There is no one
responsible for the Announcements listserv, the website has a webkeeper but no
oversight group, and our Office Coordinator, with help from individuals is
responsible for vetting people who want to be included in our mailing lists.
This proposal is for a Communications Committee that becomes
the home of IT, Gleamings, the website, announcements and mailing lists, and
the Google Drive.
Given normal Quaker process, the committee will be charged
with filling out its charter so that it incorporates anything that this
proposal missed or new things that need to be included.
June 2021
RantWoman comments:
--Even though RantWoman thoroughly approves the idea of creating
such a committee RantWoman STRONGLY recommends holding over approval of the
minute until Friends have had the opportunity to season what instructions they
want to convey to Nominating Committee and what they expect of the committee
going forward.
--Considering LONGSTANDING patterns of ignoring RantWoman’s
concerns about accessibility, recent repetitions of that pattern, and in particular
the current Clerk of Nominating Committee’s individual patterns which RantWoman
is happy to elaborate, RantWoman has ZIP confidence that simply sending this
minute off to Nominating Committee without clear instructions from Meeting for
Business will speak to all the needs on RantWoman’s mind.
--Some things RantWoman would like to expect:
Recognition
that RantWoman really WANTS to hear the voices of other Friends and to work
toward a blessed community, even on days when a “bless your hearts” community
is where people are resolutely mired.
Articulation of clear policies, inclusiveness in creating the policies,
and transparency about what they are.
NOTHING ABOUT US WITHOUT US. People do NOT get just to blabber in email
about “you are not welcome here.” NO ONE
welcomes life-changing medical events in midlife or frankly any other time. RantWoman has NO patience with all the
different forms she hears of “It’s not good for the community…” or “maybe the
community can’t handle…,” this latter from a person with a disability who
sounds like the community is supposed to handle that Friends disability but not
RantWoman’s.
Inclusion in the policies explicit
commitment to some standards of accessibility that meeting the varying needs,
communications patterns among Friends, and evolving technologies. RantWoman
here applies the same single standard of truth she is applying in a much bigger
forum: people are not born knowing basic accessibility standandards but if they
are standards, people learn them in the course of ongoing work. AND if people
are open to continuing revelation, there is also room for programs like QuEST
to nurture awareness of disabilities issues in the course of regular
activities.
Space to lament the laying down of weekly First Day School. RantWoman meant to go on separately about that but maybe needs to leave room for Friends to digest these comments, partly in hopes that if adults practice communicating better that will create space to foster spiritual grown for more young families and evenMAYBE possibly create a less ableist world for some young Friends RantWoman has noticed.
In Light and faithfulness.
RantWoman.
No comments:
Post a Comment