RantWoman finally spoke up at Ramadan at her NotFGC event.
RantWoman spoke up partly on behalf of people she knows who are muslim and who MIGHT possibly be more drawn to participate in the state affiliate of the NotFGC event if every single person offering morning invocations did not have some kind of identifier marking them as explicitly Christian.
Oh, no, not discussion of religion and with explicit language to boot. RantWoman has NO problem with explicity language as long as there are different strands of explicit languages. Others have other views.
At NotFGC, got shows up in discussion of resolutions. Discussion is run at a brisk space, with options to speak for and against but with time limits: 2 minutes / statement.
TWO WHOLE MINUTES: hardly anyone RantWoman observed used their full two minutes, but people did use enough time for RantWoman to recognize that the topic of explicit language has been discussed.
. If there are not balancing statements for and against, debate is curbed quickly and a vote is taken. IN this case, the resolution failed but RantWoman has been left with a sense that some care has been taken. In any case please hold RantWoman's twitches in the Light.
One of the public comments, reflected above "Oh God, do we have to talk about religion?"
In private, someone else: Right on!"