Thursday, March 28, 2019

Rename? Discern?


Hi Friends

Someone at Meeting mentioned today that Friends Center Committee wants to rename itself to something more welcoming or something. I have no idea what is to be proposed and apologies in advance if this comes across as another round of (RantWoman's) perpetual fussiness about wording, but two things come to me very strongly.

  1. One reason I am attached to the name is that actually the name Friends Center predates the existence of UFM. It dates from when the Friends Center at the University was a mission of what was then a mission from Friends Memorial Church. Friends Memorial is now North Seattle Friends Church and two yearly meeting names removed from its connection to Indiana Yearly Meeting. RantWoman cannot just go root in archibess by herself but Is there someone on this list who could look this up in our minutes or records just as a nod to our history and Quaker origin story?
     
  2. The fact that I am in love with / attached to this history alone should not keep us from changing the name of the committee if others feel clearly drawn to something new. BUT what if instead of changing the committee we decided to think of what the words mean and let that be the core of how we revitalize the name Friends Center?
    1. Friends: I cannot remember the place in the New Testament where Christ tells the disciples they are his Friends, but that is part of the origin of the term Friends in the first place. But what does the word Friends mean to us in terms of community and things I think we want the committee name to speak to?
       
    2. Center: what is at the center of our community? What do we mean centering? Worship? What is at the center of our community life?
       
    3. What might we do with all this reflection: maybe leave the committee name as is with an added slogan? Maybe incorporate some thoughts into the committee description. Maybe express profound thanks to everyone who connects by helping with cleanup and thinking about other ways people connect?
       

Having a conversation by email would help me have a sense of shared discernment. Would Friends feel able to do that? I promise no more than one interaction per 24 hours and to change the subject line if the topic appears to drift.

 

Thank you all very much for thinking about this and for whatever rises in response.

 

In Light and faithfulness

 

(RantWoman)

Wednesday, March 20, 2019

For consideration after the last Business Meeting


                                                                        March 9, 2019

Dear Friends

First I want to thank everyone who has been coming to Meeting for Business recently. I truly am grateful for energy, no matter what the energy carries with it.

I know I have hurt many people’s feelings. I do not know how to move forward without being present in the conversation. I recognize that this point will be uncomfortable for many people. I believe in the kind of God that can hold all who are present and I ask that we all hold in the Light:

Our Clerk, Merlin.

The needs of our community

Ourselves with all our individual needs and complexes, roles in the community, perspectives on vital issues of the day, and life challenges.

Opportunity to experience continuing revelation, consideration of what practices bring Light to our community , which do not, and where if led we might look for paths to learning and growth.

 

I have been reading minutes and holding many things prayerfully:

the many OWWW’s I read in the January minutes,

a deep sense of overwhelm and a desire for openings so that “the yoke is easy and the burden is light.”

my love and gratitude for this Meeting community,

my desire for the community to flourish.

A sense from conversation that desire for me to stay away is not as unanimous as is reported in the minutes. I have told more than one person that if they have a concern that I be present they need to speak up.

 

As a person with a disability I have also sometimes been called to be present in places where my presence is to some degree or another explicitly not wanted. For better or worse, solid grounding in worship and spiritual seeking increases my willingness to attend to that call or at least to season deeply a desire for direct conversation. And I am humble about those who enjoy the privilege of getting to come and go from realities I deal with all the time.

I also appreciate a number of Friends who have said they are willing to be part of an Ad-hoc committee on Disability at UFM.  Currently Friends have formed a Clearness Committee and are seasoning what work to propose, a desire to see what can get done in a year and then to reassess. I deeply hope this work will nourish our community and promote healing and growth. If you are interested in talking more about this, please contact (RantWoman or the other brave souls who have formed the Clearness Committee)

Lest everyone just think I am completely incorrigible, I appreciate Worship and Ministry’s efforts to think about rules the community can live with. And I find the current draft highly imperfect on numerous grounds. The question is what would support spirit led seasoning by the whole community.

In the past Friends have suggested I go worship in Quaker House or downstairs in the childcare room. I am clear that I am unwilling to worship in places that are physically inaccessible to people I might choose to worship with including my sister and other people with mobility limitations. There is a work party in the library that I do not want to interfere with. I have been saying that I have faith that God will show up on Sunday and that I have no idea what that will look like. Let us please hold that problem in the Light.

 

In Light and Faithfulness.

 

(RantWoman)

 

Tuesday, March 19, 2019

God, via mass and pipe organ again


Lent plus music, with embodied faith and presence.

 

A soul debt has been paid.

 

RantDad always said “I don’t want anything fancy at my funeral, just the Bach B Minor Mass.”

 

Um, Dad, we’re protestants / a quaker / …. I am pretty sure saying Mass over deceased Protestants is…

 

In the end RantDad’s memorial was packed. There was plenty of music, but no B Minor Mass.

 

Until Sunday.

 

RantMom has been determined that the family WILL find some music during Lent. RantMom found out about the B Minor Mass, went down herself to buy tickets and reserve seating compatible with Little Sister’s wheelchair.

 

The music was exquisite, a completely fitting memorial for both RantDad and Quaker Honorary Auntie and all the music connected with them.

 

RantWoman posted snarky commentary about the olfactory experience on her other blog. Earth to RantWoman, consider what the olfactory experience probably was in Bach’s time.

 

And then, Monday a text from Auxiliary BackUp Mom Friend: I have tickets for us at an Organ recital.

 

Um, okay, I THINK it can work with the schedule….

 

The Fisk organ at Benaroya. RantWoman does not have the patience to find the name of the organist or the program to be sure she spells the composers’ names right.

 

There was a piece about the life of Christ, complete with feeling the crucifixion.

 

There was a Toccatta which the performer played by memory.

 

There were 6 Variations and a Fugue.

 

There was at least 20 minutes of improvisation on themes of Beethoven.

 

There was appreciation from several quarters of the athleticism involved in the performance.

 

RantWoman’s brain is still running around in the harmonies and dancing in the variations. That plus a work deadline is getting in the way of tending …

 

Hold the tending and everything that needs to be tended in the Light.

Saturday, March 16, 2019

Gathered, Experiential, Trustworthy AND "In Contact With Ebola" -

Verily, at least around RantWoman, God has a peculiar sense of humor, prompting RantWoman to post all of the following items as a spiritual snapshot of the state of RantWoman's soul











https://alongrestlessness.com/2018/10/27/an-experimental-faith/amp/?__twitter_impression=true



https://blog.canyoubelieve.me/2019/03/trustworthy-part-three-choices.html






This item is why RantWoman tagged this post Business Meeting. RantWoman is not called to explain the moments RantWoman finds metaphorical. RantWoman MAYalso manage to "keep low" and not go on about Friends around her being metaphor-challenged.


Please hold this whole circus in the Light, RantWoman, Friends exhibiting various fragility and frailty, neenergy and old presences.







Tuesday, March 12, 2019

MInute on U District Mobility Planning and Climate Change


2019-02(2)-01:                        Peace and Social Concerns:  Mobility Minute


(excerpted from Draft minutes because RantWoman does not expect changes and because RantWoman wants to be able to find this in the future. Full text of minute and resources at botgtom of this post.)

 

Erica Schweizer and Malcolm Taran jointly presented a minute, “Mobility Planning and Addressing Climate Disruption,” as well as a short writing by Malcolm, “Nature, Science, and Understanding Choices We Face.”  They also acknowledged that Jonathan Betz-Zall was instrumental in a lot of the work behind this minute, but could not be present at today’s meeting.  They read the minute, then asked us to consider how public transportation does or does not work for us, personally.

 

Discussion:

*  some find Seattle’s Metro, and Snohomish County’s Sound, transit systems to be excellent, and believe them to be leaders in the nation.  Others find European systems to be vastly superior

*  some of us use public transit frequently, or even exclusively; some forsee using it more, as the demands of age make driving a car less feasible; others find catching a bus at night, in the dark, with a long wait, to be a challenge it’s hard to live up to consistently; others find it convenient only when going downtown (many bus connections) or to the airport; others find the journey itself worthwhile, since it puts us in touch with our fellow citizens, and forces us to engage in the relative slowness of bus-riding (and bus-awaiting)

*  some public transit users are marginalized people; some people aren’t able to consider using Lyft or Uber

*  even those of us who don’t live in the University District can come to feel responsible for this neighborhood, by virtue of worshipping here over time

*  what is the purpose of this minute?  to endorse the principles of the UDM?  or the “nitty gritty,” of which some of us may be unfamiliar?  Similarly, what position, if any, has the Church Council taken on this issue?  (apparently, they are not taking the lead– UFM would be endorsing the minute, and forwarding it on to the Church Council for them to season with other churches)

*  given that we are not clear on all the requisite details, and that we are comfortable approving the spirit and and principle of the minute, we came to unity on approving the minute with the following revision:  in paragraph 3, changing the third sentence from “We endorse the methods and principles of the U District Mobility Project (UDM)” to “We endorse the principles and spirit…”

 

Friends approved the “Mobility Planning and Addressing Climate Disruption” minute with the above minor change

 

RantWoman will figure out how to post the full text of the minute. But not tonight.

 

RantWoman greatly appreciates this minute for asking Friends to think about the evolution of our area’s and our region’s transportation infrastructure in relation to climate change.

 

RantWoman thinks this minute is highly germane to ongoing discernment about how transportation changes in the U district will affect our Meeting life.

 

RantWoman notes a comment about “nitty gritty.” RantWoman thinks it would be neighborly and supportive of our community presence for more Friends than RantWoman to take an interest in the nitty gritty of following who is who and how projects are evolving. RantWoman even thinks that tending to this would help build community and support appropriate stewardship of our own property.

 

RantWoman greatly appreciates that the draft minutes include the varying thoughts of many Friends about experience with public transportation.

 

RantWoman greatly appreciates the change accepted in the text, among other things because it nicely addresses overreach RantWoman has previously raised concerns about.

 

RantWoman likes the idea of cirdulating this minute through the Church Council of Greater Seattle and Faith Action Networkparticularly because RantWoman would appreciate a greater sense of faith community engagement about transportation issues, equity, lifestyle and community life.








University Friends Meeting [UFM letterhead]


4001 9th Ave NE


Seattle WA 98105


09 December 2018


Mobility Planning and Addressing Climate Disruption


We members of University Friends Meeting seek an Earth restored and promise to do our part to create a more welcoming and livable future. This task upholds all of Friends’ traditional testimonies on Simplicity, Peace, Equality, Community, and Integrity. We are called to examine every element of our lives and act to place in harmony our impact on our planet and to establish justice in our relationships with other people and with creation.


 


While we consider and develop deeper-reaching changes in our ways of living, we can take immediate action by working toward superseding the current automobile-oriented transportation system with more beneficial and socially-responsible ways of moving ourselves around. Transportation is the single biggest CO2 contributor by our city. Due to civic demand, our city already provides some public transportation alternatives, but many places are not conveniently served. We feel called to advocate for more thoroughgoing sustainable upgrading of our transportation system. University Monthly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends calls for equitable, sustainable transportation systems that work for people of all ages and abilities. We encourage Friends to advocate policies that uphold these testimonies through available civic processes. We endorse the methods and principles of the U District Mobility Project (UDM). The UDM exemplifies an actual project with a range of needed approaches and a diverse range of needed solutions.We recommend that the Church Council of Greater Seattle and other faith institutions join in the goals of this effort for their neighborhoods. We will distribute this Minute to the Church Council of Greater Seattle, City Council and Mayor Jenny Durkan, County Council and Executive Dow Constantine.


 


Acting on this Minute is a step toward putting ourselves in right relationship with the Earth. This step should be one in a continuing series of diverse actions.


MobilityMinute v.2.3.odt Wed. 21 Nov. 18 p.1 o f 3


 


Summary of context


Action on this task is needed due to the seriousness and scale of the problems facing the Earth. We are“called to examine every element of our lives and act” significantly due to the actions of humans.


Significant changes in environmental and economic policies are needed.


 


As we may know, the cautious or modestly reserved consensus of the world’s climate scientists is that the world is not on track to meet the minimal goals of the Paris Climate Accords of 2014. Further, the world has less than about twelve years to have in place large reductions in CO2 emissions, to avoid evident cascading feedback loops leading to vastly more cost and undesired consequences than acting now, massively. Greatly more severe consequences would affect strain on community, peace and refugee migration, strain on human rights and health, exacerbating disparity, as well as environmental degradation, unpredictable climate, and severe weather damage.


 


With transportation as the major CO2 contributor by Seattle, significant improvements leading to


reduction can be an effective action toward beginning answering need. A better future is possible, but it will require significant changes, dedicated effort, creative cooperation, and well-directed resources. Significantly meeting needs will take years, so the time for significant progress is now.


U District Mobility Plan


“Our desired outcome is a holistic, multi-modal station area mobility plan for the U District.”


“The plan is a result of both extensive and intensive community engagement.” They also collaborate with civic, city, and transit agencies. The station area plan is just one in an array of mobility projects for the U District area.


Principles:


Give top priority to pedestrian movement.


Design for pedestrian access to the station.


Provide an efficient, flexible bus network.


Create a safe and attractive street environment for people of all abilities.


Complete the bicycle network.


Address the multimodal challenges on NE 45th Street.


[“U District Station Area Mobility Plan-Summary.pdf”, docs.udistrictmobility.org]


MobilityMinute v.2.3.odt Wed. 21 Nov. 18 p.2 o f 3


 


Address the multimodal challenges on NE 45th Street.


[“U District Station Area Mobility Plan-Summary.pdf”, docs.udistrictmobility.org]


MobilityMinute v.2.3.odt Wed. 21 Nov. 18 p.2 o f 3


References


City of Seattle, Office of the Mayor, “Seattle Climate Action, April 2018”, Apr. 2018.


http://durkan.seattle.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/SeaClimateAction_April2018.pdf





City of Seattle, “Seattle Climate Action Plan”, 2018.


https://www.seattle.gov/environment/


climatechange/





climate-planning/climate-action-plan





Transportation is the leading source of Seattle's contribution to climate change [climate chaos, or more


accurately, anthropogenic climate disruption], accounting for two-thirds.


Fesler, Stephen, “University District Mobility Plan would pedestrianize the Ave and NE 43rd Street”, The


Urbanist, Oct 31, 2018, https://www.theurbanist.org/2018/10/31/university-district-mobility-plan-wouldpedestrianize-


the-ave-and-ne-43rd-st/


Goodman, Amy, interview with Dr. Anderson, Tue. 09 Oct. 2018. DemocracyNow.org.


Kevin Anderson, Zennström professor in climate change leadership at the Centre for Environment


and Development Studies at Uppsala University, Sweden, and chair of energy and climate change at the


Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of Manchester in Britain.


https://www.democracynow.org/2018/10/9/climate_scientist_as_un_warns_of





Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “Summary for Policymakers”, 2018.


http://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_final.pdf





U District Advocates, “U District Station Area Mobility Plan” (plan summary of


udistrictmobility.org/plan), Sep. 2018.


http://docs.udistrictmobility.org/U%20District%20Station%20Area





%20Mobility%20Plan%20-%20Summary.pdf





World Resources Institute, “8 things you need to know about the IPCC 1.5C Report”, Oct. 2018.


https://www.wri.org/blog/2018/10/8-things-you-need-know-about-ipcc-15-c-report





Worldwide Fund for Nature, “Living Planet Report”, biyearly. WorldWildlife.org, (WWF.org in US and


Canada).


Sample summary: Business Insider, “Half of the world’s animals have disappeared since the 1970s”,


Sep. 2014.


https://www.businessinsider.com.au/wwf-audit-half-of-the-earths-animals-have-disappeared-


sincethe-





1970s-2014-9





[2018 estimate is 60 percent.]


MobilityMinute v.2.3.odt Wed. 21 Nov. 18 p.3 o f 3

Sunday, March 10, 2019

Friday, March 8, 2019

A sad , with OWWWW


RantWoman has a sad.

 

RantWoman has been trying to hold the phrase “Friends younger than 60” in particular Light. For one thing RantWoman is still younger than 60, for a couple more years. For another thing, RantWoman notes with tenderness a number of age-related stresses among many Friends in the around 70 cohort including a number who might well step away from some activities. RantWoman feels a need to make service and more connections real for people following in their footsteps.

 

But RantWoman’s sad: RantWoman is reading minutes of the All RantWoman All the Time Minus RantWoman Meeting for Business in January. RantWoman is reading lots of OWWW. RantWoman is very sorry.

 

RantWoman is also sitting with times where God has called her to go where she is not wanted. RantWoman is sitting with whether it would be better to go immediately and sit with the sad and see where things go with centered listening or whether RantWoman should just let people be as they are for a bit. RantWoman is NOT called to go away.

 

RantWoman is also frustrated: RantWoman wants to create a welcoming space. RantWoman wants to figure out ways herself to connect with younger Friends. Chitchat in coffee hour does not work for RantWoman. RantWoman has a well of gratitude for long connections and some faces she is always very glad to see. But RantWoman also writes email. RantWoman gets it about an intense communications style. RantWoman gets it about her electronic voice being, um, pretty grating sometimes.Besides overachieving about unpleasantness, RantWoman’s life is also a bit of a Yucky Topics Festival. And RantWoman's experience of Meeting is also generating way more "Blecch" moments than seem like a good idea to RantWoman.

For example, RantWoman is trying to sit with a concern about boundaries and imposing on people. Suppose RantWoman includes someone in an email and starts off near the top, if you cannot read further please just hold in the Light, RantWoman is partly trying to express that she values that friend’s presence and that thinking of them makes her feel stronger. RantWoman would love to creat a sense that connections mean opportunity.  Obviously that is not what is happening.

 

Maybe that is enough to sit with for now.

 

Hold us all in the Light.